Before continuing, note that the movie is only “inspired”
from the book. While I haven’t seen it yet, I can only hope that it's far more
inspired than its source.
Scaramanga has all the makings of a great villain. He’s a
world-class assassin whose signature weapon is a gold-plated colt peacemaker
with an extra-long barrel. He’s a dangerous man with plenty of special agent
kills under his belt. He has a deformed anatomy with a creepy third nipple over
his heart. In addition, he’s also reported to have homosexual tendencies
because he can’t whistle (no, really). He has all the makings to be the
Moriarty to Bond’s Holmes.
Yet, when we finally encounter the man, he’s nothing more
than a gangster who can do trickshots. We never see him assassinate anyone. He
doesn’t lead Bond on a thrilling chase, always one step ahead. Instead, we see him as a ring-leader who’s
gotten in over his head and needs Bond (undercover as a security guard) to pull
him out. Yes, that's really the plot.
After the imaginative title and the awesome theme song, I
had high expectations. Yet, the more we see
of Scaramanga in the book, the less terrifying he becomes. He’s easily deceived
and never acts like a true assassin. Instead of being a terrifying
professional, Scaramanga never rises beyond being an arrogant gunslinger,
despite how many times Flemming tells us otherwise. As a corollary to the old
storytelling rule, no amount of telling can cover up not showing.
This is a shame because he truly can be a great bond
villain. Instead of pulling the strings from the shadows like Blofield, he
ought to be like a dangerous predator stalking our hero. Perhaps Christopher
Lee infused more danger into the role. I can only hope.
No comments:
Post a Comment